On Tuesday, August 5, it was reported that the EPA is preparing to terminate all 60 grants awarded under the $7 billion Solar for All program, threatening more than $60 million awarded to Wisconsin. An additional $62.3 million awarded to the Midwest Tribal Energy Resource Association is also under threat.

These funds are intended to reduce electricity bills for Wisconsin residents by installing solar energy in low-income and other disadvantaged communities. The Solar for All program, or PowerUp Wisconsin, is a significant opportunity for us to accelerate the clean energy transition in a way that recognizes the need for everyone to benefit from renewables.

The decision to end this program couldn’t come at a worse time. With some of the highest utility rates in the country, Wisconsin needs programs that can reduce electricity costs now more than ever. We need to invest in our communities, not leave them behind.

These investments wouldn’t just help hardworking Wisconsinites with high energy bills — they would also support and sustain hundreds, if not thousands, of good-quality jobs across the state.

Despite this setback, we are positive that the momentum of the clean energy transition cannot be stopped. The renewable energy industry is massive and continues to grow. Together, we can continue building the future we want to see. One where clean energy powers a strong, healthy, and vibrant Wisconsin.

On Thursday, July 24, 2025, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) determined how the state would move forward with its investigation into net metering, which was opened in response to net metering changes proposed by Madison Gas & Electric and Alliant Energy.

Initially, a Wisconsin Value of Solar Study (VoSS) was expected to be a part of the overall investigation. PSC Chairperson Summer Strand indicated during the July 24 open meeting that she was content with the VoSS information already provided in the docket, and that a Wisconsin-specific VoSS effort would require more effort than it was worth. Commissioners Kristy Nieto and Marcus Hawkins ultimately agreed with this path forward.

Though a Wisconsin-specific VoSS won’t be a part of the investigation going forward, the PSC still plans to investigate and gather additional data and information about the state of rooftop solar in Wisconsin to help guide policy decisions. We are encouraged by their continued interest in establishing clarity and data on solar installations in Wisconsin. RENEW also hopes that the PSC considers the quick phase-out of federal tax credits for residential rooftop solar as they review installation trends moving forward.

The commissioners made it clear that they will include a review of adoption rates, an evaluation of net metering options and rate designs, and the expected impacts of rate designs on customers in their investigation. In relation to rate design options, the commissioners were also interested in the incorporation of time-of-use rates and other customer technologies, such as batteries and smart thermostats, and innovative programs, such as behavior demand response and virtual power plant options for the future.

RENEW Wisconsin participated in the process as it related to creating the parameters for the VoSS and will continue to offer input whenever we have the opportunity. We will also inform members and supporters alike when there are opportunities for the public to participate in the process.

On May 14, the RENEW Wisconsin policy team submitted testimony calling for no change to how Rice Lake Utilities (RLU) compensates customers for the solar energy they produce. This testimony is in opposition to what RLU has suggested for their net energy metering (NEM) policy, which would be a reduction in compensation for solar customers.

In this case, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) will consider a NEM formula for systems at 20 kilowatts (kW) and below, and a formula for systems between 20 and 100 kW. Systems that are 20 kW or below are typically residential rooftop arrays, whereas the larger ones are often on businesses or municipal buildings. RLU currently has three customers with systems above 20 kW, all of which are schools.

Although Rice Lake Utilities is a smaller utility in northwestern Wisconsin and does not have many customers with solar, what they have proposed could change the precedent at the PSC. RENEW has decided to intervene and provide testimony to prevent the potential for statewide changes to NEM policy.

RENEW’s policy team provided evidence to the PSC in support of maintaining the status quo for both larger and smaller solar systems. We also shared potential alternatives for how RLU could transition away from the status quo should the PSC decide to allow a change to NEM benefits. These alternatives are more in line with how utility-avoided costs for Wisconsin utilities are calculated.

Utility-avoided costs are the cost an electric utility pays to generate or purchase power. This could be described as — an avoided expense that a utility would have paid by generating themselves or purchasing it from a third party, had it not come from the customer’s solar array.

RENEW feels that before the PSC decides this case, they should consider the future of municipally-owned utility payment structures for NEM. RLU’s net monthly excess generation formula for NEM currently points to their base cost of power as its avoided cost reference, and that reference remains financially viable for RLU, as well as most Wisconsin utilities. With that in mind, we are concerned that the PSC’s decision in this case might set a precedent for other similar cases.

RENEW is hopeful that the PSC will agree that it is best to leave the current NEM pay structures in place until their Value of Solar Study and NEM investigation concludes.

Next Steps for RENEW

The RLU case is ongoing, and RENEW will have the opportunity to submit rebuttal testimony and participate in a party hearing this June. We will continue to advocate for fair payments to utility customers with solar arrays. There will also be an opportunity for the public to comment on the case before a decision from the PSC in July.