“Massive solar plan for Minnesota wins bid over gas”

Massive solar plan for Minnesota wins bid over gas

  • Article by: David Shaffer
  • Star Tribune
  • December 31, 2013 – 8:58 PM

http://www.startribune.com/business/238322571.html

Minnesota soon could see at least a sevenfold expansion of solar power.
In
an unprecedented ruling, a judge reviewing whether Xcel Energy should
invest in new natural gas generators vs. large solar power arrays
concluded Tuesday that solar is a better deal.
If
the finding by Administrative Law Judge Eric Lipman is upheld by the
state Public Utilities Commission (PUC), Edina-based Geronimo Energy
plans to build about 20 large solar power arrays on sites across Xcel’s
service area at a cost of $250 million.
“It says
solar is coming in a big way to the country and to Minnesota,” Geronimo
Vice President Betsy Engelking said of the ruling.
Geronimo’s
Aurora Solar Project would receive no state or utility subsidies, but
would qualify for a federal investment tax credit. Engleking said it is
the first time in the United States that solar energy without a state
subsidy has beaten natural gas in an official, head-to-head price
comparison.
“The cost of solar has come down
much faster than anyone had anticipated,” she said in an interview.
“This is one of the reasons solar is going to explode.”
The
largest of the Geronimo projects would be five times bigger than the
state’s largest solar array in Slayton, Minn. Some would cover up to 70
acres of land. The proposed sites are in 17 counties, mostly in central,
eastern and southeastern Minnesota.
It is the
first time the state has used a competitive bidding process for a major
power generation project. The commission ordered the trial-like
proceeding to force energy companies to compete on price.
Xcel,
based in Minneapolis, and three other energy companies offered various
proposals, mostly generators powered by natural gas. Xcel’s plan
included a new gas generator at its Black Dog plant in Burnsville, where
the utility intends to retire the remaining coal-burning units.
In
a 50-page ruling, Lipman said “the greatest value to Minnesota and
Xcel’s ratepayers is drawn from selecting Geronimo’s solar energy
proposal …”
If the Aurora project is built, Xcel
likely would purchase the power under a long-term agreement. That could
help Xcel toward its requirement to get 1.5 percent of its power from
the sun by 2020 under a new state energy law. Xcel also is counting on
rooftop solar systems, community-owned arrays and its own large projects
to meet that goal.
Lipman said that if solar
alone can’t supply all of Xcel’s extra power needs in the next few
years, the utility could take up an offer to purchase surplus energy
from Great River Energy, the state’s second-largest power company. The
judge also said Xcel will have time to consider other generation
projects if electrical demand picks up.
Xcel
said in a statement that it appreciated Lipman’s work, but that it
disagreed with some of the findings and would file a written response.
Under the PUC’s rules, the competitors and other interests can take
exception to the judge’s ruling before the five-member commission takes a
vote.
Geronimo already does business with Xcel,
selling the output of its Prairie Rose Wind Farm in Rock County, in far
southwestern Minnesota. Two of four planned wind farms that Xcel will
add in the next two years — near Windom, Minn., and near Jamestown, N.D.
— are being built by Geronimo. The company has built two smaller wind
farms in southeastern Minnesota and is about to construct two more wind
farms in Michigan and Nebraska for other utilities.
Other competitors
The
other competitors considered by the judge were Houston-based Calpine,
which proposed a gas turbine in Mankato at its existing power plant
there and Chicago-based Invenergy, which proposed gas turbines at Cannon
Falls and Hampton. Xcel also proposed two gas units near Hankinson,
N.D.
“We are reviewing the [judge’s]
recommendations, and will evaluate our next steps in the docketed
proceeding,” Craig Gordon, Invenergy vice president of sales and
marketing, said in an e-mail Tuesday.
If the
Aurora Project is approved, Geronimo said the solar arrays would be
built in 2015 and 2016. Engelking said that Geronimo already has signed
deals for land and that it has identified more sites than needed in case
some don’t work out.
Each of the ground-mounted arrays would be next to an existing substation, avoiding transmission-line costs.
She
said the company still needs state or local permits. But the company
has visited with local governments and has pledged to make payments in
lieu of taxes ranging from $50,000 to $110,000 a year.
Geronimo,
a renewable energy developer, doesn’t intend to own the projects, she
said. Its financing partner, Enel Green Power, has the first option to
acquire them, she said. But it’s possible Geronimo could make a deal to
sell the arrays to Xcel or other energy companies, she said.
David Shaffer • 612-673-7090 • @ShafferStrib

FERC Chair Jon Wellinghoff: Solar ‘Is Going to Overtake Everything’

The FERC, GTM and SEIA predict that solar installations will double every year as prices continue to decline. Herman Trabish’s article for the GTM  Newsletter below notes that solar’s continuing growth will require a reformulation of distributed generation rate structures.
By Herman Trabish

If anybody doubts that federal energy regulators are aware of the rapidly changing electricity landscape, they should talk to Jon Wellinghoff, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  

“Solar is growing so fast it is going to overtake everything,” Wellinghoff told GTM last week in a sideline conversation at the National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas.  

If a single drop of water on the pitcher’s mound at Dodger Stadium is doubled every minute, Wellinghoff said, a person chained to the highest seat would be in danger of drowning in an hour.  

“That’s what is happening in solar. It could double every two years,” he said. 

Indeed, as GTM Research’s MJ Shiao recently pointed out, in the next 2 1/2 years the U.S. will double its entire cumulative capacity of distributed solar — repeating in the span of a few short years what it originally took four decades to deploy.  

Geothermal, wind, and other resources will supplement solar, Wellinghoff said. “But at its present growth rate, solar will overtake wind in about ten years. It is going to be the dominant player. Everybody’s roof is out there.” 

And those other resources have not seen declining prices like solar has. “Solar PV is $0.70 or $0.80 per watt to manufacture. Residential rooftop is $4 to $5 per watt. But they are going to drive that down to $2 and then to $1 per watt.” 

Advanced storage technologies also promise lower costs, he said. “Once it is more cost-effective to build solar with storage than to build a combustion turbine or wind for power at night, that is ‘game over.’ At that point, it will be all about consumer-driven markets.”  

Wellinghoff was a consumer advocate early in his career and has not changed sides. “Even though the FERC oversees wholesale markets, utilities, and other jurisdictional entities at the wholesale level, the consumer needs to be our major concern,” he said.   

If FERC does not ensure the grid is ready to integrate the growing marketplace demand for distributed solar and other distributed resources, Wellinghoff said, “We are going to have problems with grid reliability and overall grid costs.”  

Transmission infrastructure will be able to keep up with solar growth. The big changes will be at the distribution level where FERC has less influence, he explained. But the commission has been examining the costs and benefits of distributed generation (DG) in wholesale markets.

[READ MORE]

Why US power companies don’t want you putting a solar panel on your roof

In his article for the Quartz Daily Brief Tim Fernholz debunks electrical utility claims that increased solar panel reliance to off-set electrical costs will lead to increased rates for all customers. While the “death spiral” of increased solar energy use leading to increased electrical rates is revealed to be little more than a panicked response from power companies, Fernholz identifies that a regulatory solution must be crafted to facilitate our transition to a solar powered future.

By Tim Fernholz

In the US, electrical utilities are in a charged battle—complete with negative political ads—against solar panel distributors over rules that both sides say could put them out of business. Consumers are caught in the middle. 

A relatively new swathe of companies like Verengo, Sunrun, Sungevity and SolarCity have spent millions leasing solar equipment to homeowners and businesses. The cost of the lease is offset by savings on their electrical bill. Those savings come not just because of free power from the sun, but also through tax credits—and, most importantly today, because states allow those who have solar panels to sell any excess power back to the grid. 

The more than 200,000 “distributed solar generators” in the US produce less than 1% of the country’s electricity. But that’s growing thanks to the falling cost of photovoltaics and financing from investors like Google. And this worries the big power companies, particularly two of the country’s largest, Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison.

[READ MORE]

New Report: Wisconsin Ranks 26th in the Nation for Solar Power

Wisconsin Environment Research and Policy Center’s report Lighting the Way: What We Can Learn from America’s Top 12 Solar States identifies the twelve states making the greatest contribution to the rise of solar power in the United States. The report observes that while Wisconsin’s solar capacity is growing, this growth is far behind the increase observed in the report’s top ranking states, lagging behind enough to earn Wisconsin a ranking of 26th in the nation for per capita solar installations. The full report and the press release below identify the strong renewable energy policies adopted by the top ranking states and the reasoning for Wisconsin’s low ranking.  


Milwaukee – Today, Wisconsin Environment Research & Policy Center releasedLighting the Way: What We Can Learn from America’s Top 12 Solar States, a new report highlighting a solar energy boom across the country. The report outlines the twelve states that have made a considerable contribution to the nation’s rise in solar power. Wisconsin however, missed the cut and ranks 26th in the nation for per capita solar installations. Last year, solar capacity in Wisconsin grew by 7% bringing it to a total of 14 megawatts. But Wisconsin still trails behind leading solar states such as New Jersey that has more than 50 times as many solar installations per capita than Wisconsin. 

“The sky’s the limit on solar energy,” said Megan Severson, State Advocate with Wisconsin Environment. “The progress of other states should give us the confidence that we can do much more. Our message today is clear: If you want your state to be a leader in pollution-free solar energy, set big goals and get good policies on the books.” 

Solar is on the rise across the country. America has more than three times as much solar photovoltaic capacity as it did in 2010, and more than 10 times as much as it did in 2007. And now the price of solar panels fell by 26 percent in 2012. Wisconsin Environment attributed the solar boom to the leadership of state officials, especially those in states profiled in the report. 

“More and more, homes and businesses are turning to solar as a pollution-free energy source with no fuel costs,” said Severson. “With the increasing threat of global warming, Wisconsin must become a leading solar state.”

[READ MORE

Dropping Prices and Low Maintenance Costs Encourage Local Solar Installations

Responding to decreasing solar energy systems costs, Stone House Development Inc. invests in a 117 solar panel setup above their new mixed use apartment building in Shorewood Hills. Phil Levin’s report for NBC 15 notes that projects like this could be just the beginning. Read the article below and watch the video report to learn more.


By Phil Levin

Local developers are reconsidering solar panel installations as prices drop and energy efficiencies rise.

The projects were previously prohibitively expensive as
pricey installations could take years to generate enough energy to
offset their cost. Commercial arrays can now pay for themselves in as
few as five years.


“If you are going to be owning the building for ten years
or more, you’re going to recoup those costs and the savings will keep
going another 15 plus years after that,” said Full Spectrum Solar
Founder Burke O’Neal.


His group installs the arrays on residential and commercial
buildings. They recently set up 117 panels above a new mixed-use
apartment building in Shorewood Hills called Arbor Crossing.

The panels will produce energy when the sun is out to power common area
utilities like lighting in hallways and the garage. In the middle of the
day the solar array might generate more energy than those circuits
need, causing the Madison Gas and Electric meter to spin backwards.

[READ MORE]